Think Backwards

Consider the following:

If you imagine the standard monopoly practice being to undersell the competition in a price war until they go out of business, consider: what happens when you and your competition already offer products for free?

The answer in this case: have less ads. It’s simple when you think in terms of economic value and not just money. However, that brings up the obvious question: Did monopolies ever work by that way? (Did MS undersell their products? Was Office/Windows ever underpriced?)

Comments

  1. Tim says:

    Youtube basically tried (is trying?) this. I’m pretty sure they have nearly zero revenue.

  2. Chris says:

    Youtube assumes that someone will buy them while they have the market share to be a veritable video monopoly.

    Unfortunately for them, they’re not an established monopoly and have no way to “return to profitability by driving everyone out of business and then increase prices,” because it’s too early for that. If the VCs keep pumping money in maybe YT can pull some ads, but yeah, for now, they’re basically draining cash.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>