Posted on February 6th, 2006 by Chris.
Categories: Chris, General/Misc., Politics, War for Censorship.
http://www.columbiaspectator.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2004/02/24/403b152226672?in_archive=1
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4681294.stm
Discuss.
Posted on December 23rd, 2004 by Chris.
Categories: Chris, Philosophy, War for Censorship.
Due to my watching of Monty Python and the Holy Grail, and our own quest for the er hu, I have not been present for most of the debates. While I am neutral on the NS issue, I have some important issues that must be resolved before we can continue.
First of all, democracy comes from the right to represent yourself. The Liuism Party demands representation on the executive council. We have fought in the War on Poker, and many other wars before that. How can you deny the right to govern to your own people, those who post with you and fight along side you! It is a travesty and outright injustice to deny the Liuism Party a voice on the council, and we will strike for that right.
Since the Gas Protocol agrees with most of the principles we outlined before in the last post, we will create a further evolution of this Protocol, as requested by Gas. The Liuigi Doctrine dictates that censorship is important, but the right to free speech is the most important right we can have. The Liuigi Doctrine supports free speech, and the Gas Protocol allows for censorship. Together they form the foundation of our philosophy.
I hope everyone will remain civil during this discussion. The only good fight is a dead one.
Posted on December 23rd, 2004 by Tim.
Categories: General/Misc., Philosophy, Politics, Tim, War for Censorship.
I’ve decided to formalize the Gas Protocol. (Liuigi Protocol sounds better but it isn’t liuigi writing it unfortunately. It is based on his post a few days ago though, so maybe it still works…)
The Gas Protocol:
Censorship is bad.
Pissing people off is bad.
Pissing people off makes people want to censor.
Censoring people pisses them off.
Everyone can piss people off.
Therefore, everyone should be able to censor other people.
This is known as MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction).
Conclusion: Don’t censor.
-Tim
Posted on December 23rd, 2004 by Ns.
Categories: General/Misc., War for Censorship.
Looks like Tardicus is going John Kerry style (flip-flopping) with his views. When he wanted censorship rights, I will again point out that he said “… Censorship by all or censorship by none! Tardicus is fighting for his right to censor and for the right of any stooges that may follow to censor…” or more specifically, the part where he says ‘any stooges that my follow’. So now I have a few questions for Tardicus. Did you only say this to get your censorship rights? Should you not be on strike now since a ‘stooge’ who followed is not being granted his right to censorship. Finally, when will you stand behind your word and support my right to censorship… or will you not?