<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Bloj &#187; TOS Collection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.strafenet.com/category/tos-collection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.strafenet.com</link>
	<description>is a GLOBAL mission focused, values based and demographics driven organization.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 04:27:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>And you thought Terms of Service were bad&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.strafenet.com/2008/02/10/and-you-thought-terms-of-service-were-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.strafenet.com/2008/02/10/and-you-thought-terms-of-service-were-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOS Collection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.strafenet.com/2008/02/10/and-you-thought-terms-of-service-were-bad/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I could use a good translation for this.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could use a good translation for <a href="http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=107_cong_public_laws&amp;docid=f:publ155.107">this</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.strafenet.com/2008/02/10/and-you-thought-terms-of-service-were-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thunderbird TOS</title>
		<link>http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/12/22/thunderbird-tos/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/12/22/thunderbird-tos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 04:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business/The Software Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOS Collection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/12/22/thunderbird-tos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.strafenet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/thunderbirdtos.png" title="I understand you need it for CYA, I really do. And I understand that there has to be a full version in legalese that you agree to. But is it really necessary to put the user through the act of pretending to read it?"><img src="http://blog.strafenet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/thunderbirdtos.png" alt="I understand you need it for CYA, I really do. And I understand that there has to be a full version in legalese that you agree to. But is it really necessary to put the user through the act of pretending to read it?" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/12/22/thunderbird-tos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook TOS</title>
		<link>http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/11/26/facebook-tos/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/11/26/facebook-tos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 06:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business/The Software Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOS Collection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UI Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/11/26/facebook-tos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
http://www.facebook.com/terms.php
There are 6000 words and 70+ paragraphs. How many Facebook users do you think actually know the legal terms they accept when they join the site?
Quote:
PLEASE READ THESE TERMS OF USE CAREFULLY AS THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS, REMEDIES AND OBLIGATIONS. THESE INCLUDE VARIOUS LIMITATIONS AND EXCLUSIONS, AND A DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <a href="http://blog.strafenet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/facebooktos.JPG" onclick="return false;" title="Direct link to file"><img src="http://blog.strafenet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/facebooktos.thumbnail.JPG" alt="Facebook’s TOS" height="128" width="156" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/terms.php">http://www.facebook.com/terms.php</a></p>
<p>There are 6000 words and 70+ paragraphs. How many Facebook users do you think actually know the legal terms they accept when they join the site?</p>
<p>Quote:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>PLEASE READ THESE TERMS OF USE CAREFULLY AS THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS, REMEDIES AND OBLIGATIONS. THESE INCLUDE VARIOUS LIMITATIONS AND EXCLUSIONS, AND A DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE THAT GOVERNS HOW DISPUTES WILL BE RESOLVED.</strong></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/11/26/facebook-tos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ubi.com TOS</title>
		<link>http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/09/08/ubicom-tos/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/09/08/ubicom-tos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 19:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOS Collection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/09/08/ubicom-tos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Yet another 5 for 5 on the TOS design hitlist!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.strafenet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/ubisofttos.png" title="ubi.com TOS"><img src="http://blog.strafenet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/ubisofttos.thumbnail.png" alt="ubi.com TOS" /></a></p>
<p>Yet another 5 for 5 on the <a href="http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/08/23/transparently-asinine/">TOS design hitlist</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/09/08/ubicom-tos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe Acrobat TOS</title>
		<link>http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/09/06/adobe-acrobat-tos/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/09/06/adobe-acrobat-tos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 03:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOS Collection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/09/06/adobe-acrobat-tos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
5 for 5 on following the annoying TOS guidelines!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.strafenet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/acrobattos.JPG" title="Adobe Acrobat TOS"><img src="http://blog.strafenet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/acrobattos.thumbnail.JPG" alt="Adobe Acrobat TOS" /></a></p>
<p>5 for 5 on following the annoying TOS guidelines!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/09/06/adobe-acrobat-tos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transparently Asinine</title>
		<link>http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/08/23/transparently-asinine/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/08/23/transparently-asinine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 02:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business/The Software Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOS Collection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking Outside the WTF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UI Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/08/23/transparently-asinine/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are some things that are so obviously demonstrate that companies hate consumers that we take them for granted.
Here&#8217;s one all-too-familiar example:

The Terms of Service, or TOS, are a standard prerequisite for signing up for almost everything on the internet, from Amazon to Neopets to Flickr. This document usually contains all the rules required to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some things that are so obviously demonstrate that companies hate consumers that we take them for granted.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s one all-too-familiar example:<a href="http://blog.strafenet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/tos.png" title="NVidia Terms of Service"><img src="http://blog.strafenet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/tos.png" alt="NVidia Terms of Service" height="478" width="651" /></a><br />
<br clear="all" /><br />
The Terms of Service, or TOS, are a standard prerequisite for signing up for almost everything on the internet, from Amazon to Neopets to Flickr. This document usually contains all the rules required to join the service. These cover all sorts of policies, from standards of behavior to <em>giving away your phone number to telemarketers</em> [<a href="http://news.com.com/AOL+dumps+new+member+policy/2100-1023_3-201927.html" title="AOL dumps new member policy" target="_blank">1</a>] to <strong>waiving your right to legal action</strong>. [<a href="http://consumerist.com/consumer/victories/cingulars-class-arbitration-waiver-ruled-unconscionable-by-9th-circuit-court-of-appeals-290806.php" title="Cingular's Class Arbitration Waiver Ruled " target="_blank">2</a>]</p>
<p>Try applying principles of UI design to a TOS. You should notice immediately:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Everything about your average TOS screams out, &#8220;Don&#8217;t read this, but skim it and check the box that says you did.&#8221;</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>(1) The box is usually packed into an <em>unnecessarily small space</em> (in the nVidia example, it&#8217;s actually clipping most of the available room!)</p>
<p>(2) The page looks like it&#8217;s from the Web 0.1 era. Ever see links on a TOS?</p>
<p>(3) It&#8217;s totally impossible to read. Look at any TOS. It&#8217;s called a table of contents, geniuses. Use it.</p>
<p>(4) Doesn&#8217;t contain any interpretation. The legalese is required to get through in the courts, obviously. But why shouldn&#8217;t they provide a side-by-side translation or basic explanation?</p>
<p>(5) The check box almost never requires you to read the agreement.</p>
<p>This is something that has been around since the pre-Internet days; the fine print is nothing new.</p>
<blockquote><p>What&#8217;s different now is that<strong> the Internet has made everything so much easier that, when it comes to Terms of Service, it&#8217;s blatantly obvious that they don&#8217;t want you to know what you&#8217;re agreeing to. We should demand better.<br />
</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>From now on, the Blog of Justice will have its own TOS, available <a href="http://blog.strafenet.com/?page_id=635" title="By clicking on this link, you agree that we kick ass.">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.strafenet.com/2007/08/23/transparently-asinine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.292 seconds -->
