<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Blog of Justice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.strafenet.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.strafenet.com</link>
	<description>Since 2004</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 14:54:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;When you have enough data, sometimes, you don&#8217;t have to be too clever&#8221; by datt</title>
		<link>http://blog.strafenet.com/2011/12/17/when-you-have-enough-data-sometimes-you-dont-have-to-be-too-clever/comment-page-1/#comment-47203</link>
		<dc:creator>datt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 14:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.strafenet.com/?p=2015#comment-47203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the way he explain to them.This kind of culture encourage every one to listen...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the way he explain to them.This kind of culture encourage every one to listen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using code coverage to decide what to deprecate by smart person</title>
		<link>http://blog.strafenet.com/2011/12/09/using-code-coverage-to-decide-what-to-deprecate/comment-page-1/#comment-46996</link>
		<dc:creator>smart person</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 22:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.strafenet.com/?p=2007#comment-46996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I discur, i come here often for minesweeper articles]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I discur, i come here often for minesweeper articles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Barrel Rolls by tired terry</title>
		<link>http://blog.strafenet.com/2010/10/17/barrel-rolls/comment-page-1/#comment-45169</link>
		<dc:creator>tired terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 03:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.strafenet.com/?p=910#comment-45169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so does fattus]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so does fattus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Perils of Not Having Twins: A Paradox by Tim</title>
		<link>http://blog.strafenet.com/2006/02/01/the-perils-of-not-having-twins-a-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-44179</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.strafenet.com/2006/02/01/the-olsen-twins-paradox/#comment-44179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the key difference in the questions is the information given. In Q1/Q3, we are given a &lt;i&gt;specific&lt;/i&gt; child&#039;s gender. In Q2 we are given a non-specific child&#039;s gender.

In other words, the information provided is different, so the probabilities given the information is different. In Q2, the information given is:

∃x.(x ∈ kids; Male( x ) )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the key difference in the questions is the information given. In Q1/Q3, we are given a <i>specific</i> child&#8217;s gender. In Q2 we are given a non-specific child&#8217;s gender.</p>
<p>In other words, the information provided is different, so the probabilities given the information is different. In Q2, the information given is:</p>
<p>∃x.(x ∈ kids; Male( x ) )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monopoly by How can you make money if it&#8217;s free? (Profit models of Free Open Source) &#8212; The Bloj</title>
		<link>http://blog.strafenet.com/2005/02/03/monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-44056</link>
		<dc:creator>How can you make money if it&#8217;s free? (Profit models of Free Open Source) &#8212; The Bloj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.strafenet.com/?p=184#comment-44056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] law or self interest intervenes. However, unless software must change from year to year (think Madden NFL), there is no reason that a service-oriented business like Red Hat couldn&#8217;t produce an open [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] law or self interest intervenes. However, unless software must change from year to year (think Madden NFL), there is no reason that a service-oriented business like Red Hat couldn&#8217;t produce an open [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Economics of Open Source by Is free software really free? &#8212; The Bloj</title>
		<link>http://blog.strafenet.com/2006/02/24/the-economics-of-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-44055</link>
		<dc:creator>Is free software really free? &#8212; The Bloj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.strafenet.com/2006/02/24/the-economics-of-open-source/#comment-44055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and I have written a number of articles on the topic of the economics of open source. One thing that I think neither of us has directly addressed is that there is a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and I have written a number of articles on the topic of the economics of open source. One thing that I think neither of us has directly addressed is that there is a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where Google and Microsoft are actually competing by Microsoft vs. Google Pt. 4: Why would you use a &#8220;poor&#8221; client? &#8212; The Bloj</title>
		<link>http://blog.strafenet.com/2006/07/12/where-google-and-microsoft-are-actually-competing/comment-page-1/#comment-44054</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft vs. Google Pt. 4: Why would you use a &#8220;poor&#8221; client? &#8212; The Bloj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.strafenet.com/2006/07/12/where-google-and-microsoft-are-actually-competing/#comment-44054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Instant messenging? Perfectly capable of being web based. E-mail? Gmail does everything I could need, and so does Hotmail. Music? I listen to Pandora. Even videos are the internet&#8217;s business now. This illustrates an interesting fact: We are consistently moving towards making it easier to build applications, even at the cost of some power. Web apps are the closest we&#8217;ve come to easy; there are no Windows API calls to make, simple architectures, and what&#8217;s compiling? We&#8217;re almost at the point where basically everyone can get involved; Cheng and File could practically be web developers already, and as Gas said, it&#8217;s about the developers. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Instant messenging? Perfectly capable of being web based. E-mail? Gmail does everything I could need, and so does Hotmail. Music? I listen to Pandora. Even videos are the internet&#8217;s business now. This illustrates an interesting fact: We are consistently moving towards making it easier to build applications, even at the cost of some power. Web apps are the closest we&#8217;ve come to easy; there are no Windows API calls to make, simple architectures, and what&#8217;s compiling? We&#8217;re almost at the point where basically everyone can get involved; Cheng and File could practically be web developers already, and as Gas said, it&#8217;s about the developers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why is this? by &#187; Thanks, Facebook, you saved my privacy The Bloj</title>
		<link>http://blog.strafenet.com/2010/09/14/why-is-this/comment-page-1/#comment-43576</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Thanks, Facebook, you saved my privacy The Bloj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 06:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.strafenet.com/?p=903#comment-43576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] it worth worrying about spam when we already receive postal spam we&#8217;ve never had an easy way of unsubscribing [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it worth worrying about spam when we already receive postal spam we&#8217;ve never had an easy way of unsubscribing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Getting a sense of scale by Tim</title>
		<link>http://blog.strafenet.com/2010/05/25/getting-a-sense-of-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-41990</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 17:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.strafenet.com/?p=868#comment-41990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This reminds me of all those people who said &quot;I can write Stack Overflow in X hours&quot;. If you can put together a prototype in two days, you&#039;re probably not going to be a technology company.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of all those people who said &#8220;I can write Stack Overflow in X hours&#8221;. If you can put together a prototype in two days, you&#8217;re probably not going to be a technology company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Today&#8217;s One Paragraph Blog: Dog by khushal</title>
		<link>http://blog.strafenet.com/2008/01/30/todays-one-paragraph-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-41103</link>
		<dc:creator>khushal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.strafenet.com/2008/01/30/todays-one-paragraph-blog/#comment-41103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[amzaing]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amzaing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blog.strafenet.com/comments/feed/ ) in 0.24692 seconds, on May 19th, 2013 at 4:36 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 19th, 2013 at 5:36 am UTC -->